1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.

A third reason could be that journals and publishers are multinational increasingly. During the past, the editor and editorial plank of a journal understood both the scientific field it covered and the people working in it, but it’s almost impossible to be sufficiently well linked when both editors and submissions come from across the world. Having authors suggest the best reviewers may therefore look like a good idea. In the aftermath of the recent scandals involving fake peer reviewers, many journals have decided to turn off the reviewer-recommendation option on the manuscript-submission systems. But that move may not be enough, as the publisher Hindawi found out this past springtime.Jon Gieser, M.D., a retina-vitreous expert at the Wheaton Attention Clinic, in Wheaton, Ill., and assistant medical professor of ophthalmology at the University of Illinois Eyesight and Hearing Infirmary in Chicago, was the ophthalmologist who treated Joseph pursuing his attention damage. The pressure in his attention was dangerously elevated. There was so much blood in leading of the eye that I couldn’t see the back again of his vision. Related StoriesNew UCLA study looks at primary care medical home in reducing childrens' repeat appointments to hospitalsGood news for patients suffering from dry age-related macular degenerationVISERA 4K UHD endoscopy system gives surgeons 4x resolutionDr.